Report Tester Feedback¶

Tester Program · Standard Test · Your Own Workflow · Advanced · Safari · Markdown Import & Round Trip · Feedback

Usability findings are as important as technical defects. Complete the fields that apply, copy the finished report, and paste it into an email. Nothing you enter on this page is transmitted or saved by Lyreline.

1. Tester information

Tester name or initials

Test date

Lyreline version/build

macOS version

Mac model Optional

2. Test type

Select every test you completed.

3. Overall experience

1 = Very difficult / poor 5 = Very easy / excellent

Getting started Capture Organizing captured content Creating/editing a Procedure Image editing Markdown import & round trip Publication Review Exported documentation quality Help/documentation Overall usefulness

4. Markdown import & round-trip testing

If you tested Markdown, try the full workflow: import an existing .md file, review what Lyreline found, create native content, save and reopen it, export it back to Markdown, then re-import the exported Markdown and compare the result.

What kind of Markdown did you import?

Were headings, steps, and ordering recognized correctly?

Were referenced images/assets handled as expected?

Was the review/conversion plan clear before native content was created?

Did the resulting native Lyreline content match what you expected?

Did the imported content survive save/reopen correctly?

Were you able to export the Procedure back to Markdown?

What happened when you re-imported the exported Markdown?

What, if anything, was lost, changed, skipped, or reordered during import/export/re-import?

Did Lyreline interpret anything differently from what you expected?

Other Markdown workflow feedback

5. Usability feedback

What was easiest?

What was most confusing?

Where did you hesitate?

Was there terminology you did not understand?

Could not find how to continue

At any point, did you know what you wanted Lyreline to do next but could not tell how to make it do it?

If yes, describe what happened.

Where were you?

What were you trying to do?

What did you expect to happen?

What did you eventually do?

What took more steps than expected?

Documentation discovery

Did you notice Lyreline had Help?

Did Help answer your question?

Which Help pages did you use?

What topic was missing or too technical?

6. Value

Did Lyreline save time compared with how you normally create documentation?

Would you use Lyreline again?

Would you recommend it to someone who creates procedures?

What manual work did Lyreline eliminate?

What type of work would you use it for?

What would make Lyreline significantly more useful?

7. Defect report Optional

Area

Severity

Severity definitions

BLOCKER: Cannot continue the primary workflow or significant data appears lost.
MAJOR: Feature fails or behaves incorrectly, but another path may exist.
MINOR: Annoying or confusing but does not prevent completion.
USABILITY: Feature technically works, but it is difficult to understand or use.
SUGGESTION: Enhancement or idea rather than a defect.

What were you trying to do?

Steps leading to the problem

Expected result

Actual result

Exact error message, if any

Could you reproduce it?

Did restarting Lyreline change anything?

Do you have a screenshot?

8. Feature request or idea Optional

What did you expect Lyreline to do?

Why would this be useful?

How important is it?

9. Final comments

Anything else you want us to know?

Open Email

Send your feedback¶

Complete the relevant fields above.
Select Copy Feedback.
Select Open Email.
Paste the copied report into the message.
Attach a screenshot only if it is safe to share.
Send the email to lyreline.support@icloud.com.

The email button includes only the support address and subject. It does not put your report into a URL or transmit any form value.

Manual copy template if JavaScript is unavailable

LYRELINE BETA TESTER FEEDBACK

TESTER INFORMATION
Tester:
Date:
Version:
macOS:
Mac:

TEST TYPE

OVERALL EXPERIENCE — 1 (very difficult / poor) to 5 (very easy / excellent)
Getting started:
Capture:
Organizing captured content:
Creating/editing a Procedure:
Image editing:
Markdown import & round trip:
Publication Review:
Exported documentation quality:
Help/documentation:
Overall usefulness:

MARKDOWN IMPORT & ROUND TRIP
Source type:
Headings/steps/order recognized:
Images/assets handled correctly:
Review/conversion plan clear:
Native Lyreline content matched expectations:
Save/reopen preserved imported content:
Export back to Markdown:
Re-import result:
Anything lost, changed, skipped, or reordered:
Unexpected interpretation:
Other Markdown feedback:

USABILITY
What was easiest:
Most confusing:
Where I hesitated:
Terminology I did not understand:
Could not find how to continue:
What took more steps than expected:

VALUE
Did Lyreline save time:
Manual work eliminated:
Would use again:
Type of work:
Would recommend:
What would make it more useful:

DEFECT — OPTIONAL
Severity:
Area:
What I was trying to do:
Steps:
Expected:
Actual:
Error message:
Reproducible:
Restart result:
Screenshot available:

FEATURE REQUEST — OPTIONAL
Expected behavior:
Why useful:
Importance:

FINAL COMMENTS

Keys	Action
`?`	Open this help
`n`	Next page
`p`	Previous page
`s`	Search